Monday, November 9, 2009

An Apology to Time

Dear Time:

I want to confess to you that I have long believed the lie that you are my enemy. I have accused you of stealing, killing, and destroying. I have feared your implacable march and refused to remember that you answer to a good Master. I’ve denied you, blackmailed you, challenged you, and cowered before you. In short, I have treated you as everything except a friend.

I have asked you, Time, for more than you can give. I’ve extorted promises from you, expecting that you can somehow satisfy the longing for eternity that God has set in my heart. You know how very short-sighted I am, though you have borne witness to God’s faithfulness again and again. Each time you’ve pointed to him, I’ve looked to you. Forgive me for loving and fearing you so idolatrously.

You are not a minion, but a servant and friend, faithfully advancing me toward salvation—I’m so much nearer now than when I first believed! You’re bringing me closer to knowing as I am known. Your charge is to deliver me to my eternal dwelling place, where I will finally find the life that is hidden in Christ.

Oh, Time, let’s be friends. I can’t promise that I will never fear you again, that I won’t believe some of the things I hear about you, or that I won’t try to make you bear the weight of glory from time to time. But I am bringing my fears into the light tonight where the perfect love of God is at work, driving them away. So take courage! As I learn to trust your Master more, I will fear (and love) you less.

You understand, I think, that I won’t be with you forever. I know that your days are numbered like the hairs on my head. But I have a feeling that we have some good work yet to do. So let's get started!

Seeking the city that is to come,

Michele

"There have been times when I think we do not desire heaven but more often I find myself wondering whether, in our heart of hearts, we have ever desired anything else." C.S Lewis

Monday, November 2, 2009

Some Thoughts on "The Shack"

I tried to read Pilgrim’s Progress before I learned to love Scripture. I made it through a few pages and tossed it aside as irrelevant and just plain uninteresting. The language was laborious, the words seemed scripted, and I found it difficult to believe that Pilgrim/Christian could teach me anything.

But I picked it up again a couple of years ago. I’d recently spent some time in the Valley of Humiliation, and I was beginning to test out my swordsmanship. This time, I was in love with the book almost immediately. Over and over again, the thrill of the story was not in the bare facts of Christian’s victories but in the way that those victories displayed the efficacy of the whole armor of God. Pilgrim’s Progress was in my mind as I read The Shack, since many have noted similarities between the two. In my mind, the similarities end at genre. It’s kind of like comparing William James’ The Varieties of Religious Experience with Jonathan Edwards’ Religious Affections.

Does that mean I didn’t enjoy the book? No. I’ll confess that there were certain little thrills as I read it—the thrill of a new idea or a plausible spin on an old one. Countless times as I read through the book, I thought, “Wow, what a fascinating way to understand the nearness of God!" But these thrills were more like flights of fancy--God on display as we have imagined him rather than as he has revealed himself.

On a literary level, I found the book engaging but not enthralling. Young’s style is effective in that it disappears; the way that he tells the story doesn’t distract from it (nor add to it, particularly). This is a critical skill for a good storyteller, so I will be quick to assert that Young is a gifted writer. But the story never really transported me. It was much more didactic than I expected; after the first 100 pages set the stage, we were knee-deep in thinly veiled theology. Yes, the book is a work of fiction, and that matters. But since God is real and The Shack's portrayal of him is different from what the authoritative source shows, it tends to read more like revisionist history than fiction.

Young is an astute observer of human nature, and his diagnoses of sin and pain are often spot on. Much of Mack’s conversation with the members of the trinity is an attempt to explain why Mack (or other humans) do what they do. Typically, those explanations boil down to grasping for autonomy or some related sin. You won’t catch me disagreeing! But where was the cross in these discussions? I couldn’t find it. And if there’s no cross, there’s no gospel. And if there’s no gospel, there’s no help or healing. If all you can do is give me an accurate diagnosis, I am still sick.

Another thing that should be mentioned is that The Shack will be difficult to stomach if your conscience is particularly sensitive. It reminds me of that old Joan Osborne song, “What if God was one of us? / Just a slob like one of us?” If you can’t listen to that song, don’t try to read the book. Although I trust that Young’s intentions in making God so homely were good (I don’t pretend to know about Osborne’s aims), the result is sobering. Do we now dare to speak so casually and flippantly about God that we involve him in a conversation about "the trots" or imagine him calling humans "idiots"? Do we no longer feel the need to cry out with Isaiah, "Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts!”(Is 6:5).

Others have offered more detailed analysis of the theology in The Shack, and I would commend at least these two reviews to you: Tim Challies and Doug Wilson. I will speak here on one overarching issue: the authority and sufficiency of Scripture.

It is possible that I’m forgetting something, so realize that I did not read this book looking for examples to prove my case. But I cannot recall a single instance in The Shack where Scripture is referred to in a truly positive light. Scripture is always, more or less, what’s left when God doesn’t actively intervene. At best, it’s the parting gifts that you give the losers of the game show. At worst, it’s not the sword of the spirit but the dagger of religion. Mack’s seminary training is only mentioned to show its futility.

I’ll be honest with you: I’m crying as I write this part. I love God’s Word. Does my life always reflect that? No, it doesn’t. But it breaks my heart to think that someone, somewhere is going to read this book and begin to hold Scripture in contempt. Our hearts are deceitful, and we need no incentive to turn to our own devices.

The disdain for Scripture is the heart of the issue, because out of it grows the questionable theology that fuels the story. There are many points at which Young puts words into the mouth of one of the members of the godhead that directly contradict Scripture. So you find Jesus saying that his life was not meant to be an example to copy (151), though Paul exhorted the Corinthians to “be imitators of me, as I am of Christ” (I Cor 11:1). You hear God telling Mack that there’s no authority among the members of the trinity (124), which cannot be reconciled with I Cor 15:28, which says that "the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things in subjection under him, that God may be all in all”? Only if we ignore the clear teachings of Romans 13("For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God") can we buy into the conversation in which Papa calls all hierarchical relationships on earth--including political and marital--“such a waste!”(124). Once, Jesus even tells Mack that the whole trinity is submitted to him (Mack) in the same way they are submitted to one another (147). It’s hard for me to even speculate as to what this means. But, at a minimum, it would mean that God puts the will of man before his own will as an act of deference or respect. Is this the God of Scripture--the God of whom Revelation 4:11 says, “Worthy are you, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they existed and were created”? Can we possibly exist in a relationship of mutual submission with the God who upholds our very existence? Can we do so and simultaneously give him glory and worship him in the splendor of holiness? I don’t think we can.

The world of The Shack is a world built for man and not for God’s glory. At one point, while Mack is lying on his back beside Jesus, looking up at the stars, he revels in “the thought that everything was about him…about the human race…that all this was all for us” (115). I could go on. But the contents of The Shack are not what matters. What matters is the truth of Hebrews 4:12, which assures us that “the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart.” We don’t need God to turn himself into a woman or to temporarily suspend our everyday reality. We don’t need him to do fantastical things. He has done for us all that we need in Christ, told us all that we need in his word, and given us his spirit by which to interpret all these things. So my prayer is not that God would take you or me to the shack, but that he would “Open [our] eyes, that [we] may behold wondrous things out of your law” (Ps 119:18).

Sunday, July 12, 2009

God of Jacob, Love of Esau

I was born in iniquity;
And I tremble before both miserable and mighty men.
How can I stand before your holiness
On the ground that you have made, and made holy?
Esau have I loved;
My gnawing hungers drive me to despise what you have given,
What you have made mine by right of a new birth.
I let go long before you bless me, God of Jacob.

I scorn your redemption, a bowl of stew;
And sing siren songs with the voice of a wretched man;
Enemy or friend? Darkness or light?
I know not what I do.
Yet you shelter me in the day of trouble
And cover me with favor as with a shield.
Like a father, mother, husband—you love me.
Though I yet love what you have hated,
I wear your armor as you train my hands for war.

Because you knit me together, I cannot fall apart.
So I will not look long into the splintering madness of sin,
Though it beckons with all the force of the law,
Blazing, furious, impotent. Proud.
I run to you, my refuge and strength.
You stand, though the earth you made gives way.
When my foot slips, when my heart fails--your steadfast love holds me up;
As it held you up against the splintering shame of the cross,
Which holds all things together.

I cannot drift away, for you are a sure and steadfast anchor.
When my heart condemns me and my enemies seek my life,
You are greater than my heart; you are stronger than my foes.
I will never be alone, because you have put your spirit within me.
I will never be forgotten, because Christ intercedes for me at your throne.
Though I die, you are the resurrection and the life.
So spread your wings over your servant, for you are a redeemer;
And I will hold fast the confession of my hope:
You are faithful and you save to the uttermost,
My God, O God of Jacob.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

With Patience

“But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience” (Rom 8:25).

The last few weeks have taken every opportunity to remind me of who I was—of sin enjoyed, people hurt, and opportunities squandered. Such piercing recognition of depravity in myself—past, present, or future—will inevitably have an effect on my soul. Sometimes it produces joy in the exquisite wonder of my salvation—God showed his love for me in that while I was still a sinner, Christ died for me! But at other times, when it strikes in a place where faith has not penetrated, it produces fear and dread. In those moments, the stifling reality of my sin chokes out the mighty rushing wind. Panic rises up and assures me that my redemption will never loosen the choke-hold of sin; salvation will never be something that I can see and feel and enjoy. It tells me that I have a changed legal status but not a changed heart. I cannot see, I do not hope, and I will not wait with patience.

So I cower or I pace. Mostly I pace, turning my restless eyes to the places in my life where my salvation is not fully realized. With eyes fixed on those places and not on God’s perfect love, fear takes root. And the well-founded accusations of my heart begin to wear ruts into the straight paths I was making for my feet. I cannot see, I do not hope, and I will not wait with patience. It’s little surprise that I stumble and fall.

Doubting the efficacy of God’s work of sanctification is dangerous business. For if God’s work of sanctification is stalled somehow, then I must get to work immediately and I should quake with fear over who I am becoming--even this moment. What I cannot see, I dare not hope. I do not have the luxury of patience.

But Scripture says that I am being transformed into the image of Christ; though I’m not who I was, neither am I who I am becoming. For “we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another.” Paul encouraged the Corinthians to cling to their confidence in God’s work in their lives, for only such confidence can purify a conscience from dead works.

So what can I do with my heavy heart tonight in light of the Gospel? I can certainly work harder. That’s what I want to do. I want to make a long list of actions I can take to undo all the wrong done today; to infuse strength into everything that showed my weakness; to redouble my legalism in every area where I succumbed to license. In essence, I can dust off my dead works. But the author of Hebrews tells me that there is a Sabbath rest for the people of God, and that whoever has entered God's rest has also rested from his works as God did from his. Milton Vincent, in The Gospel Primer, speaks of how this rest of faith affects our day-to-day lives: "I never have to do a moment’s labor to gain or maintain my justified status before God! Freed from the burden of such a task, I now can put my energies into enjoying God, pursuing holiness, and ministering God’s amazing grace to others.”

I’m choosing not to work harder tonight. I’m choosing to do the works of God—namely, to believe in Jesus, whom he sent. I'm tearing up my list, accepting my weakness, and admitting where I abused my liberty. I'm confessing all of these things to God and entering the rest of a pure conscience and a sure hope.

I refuse to turn to futile works tonight and am, instead, thinking of ways that I can channel that energy into enjoying God and ministering his grace. Though I do not see the progress I want to see, I will hope against hope and wait with patience...for tonight.

And with God's help I will wake up tomorrow and call on His new mercies to wait with patient hope again.